12.29.06

“THAT” magazine

Posted in Life, the Universe and All that Jazz at 2:00 am by Meg

Okay, I’m getting hassled on my state Yahoo group.

Why? because one of the members is the state’s TOS representative (or something like that) and she posted that the Suarezs were going to give a free talk at a local Christian bookstore.

I came back with my typical BOYCOTT flag:

Before you go, be aware that Gena and Paul Suarez are vocal
advocates for the Pearls. While they may have some wonderful advice
for homeschoolers, any money that you put in these people’s hands
will be supporting the Pearls.

There is an international homeschool boycott against The Pearls,
their books, The Old Schoolhouse Magazine, and Mr and Mrs. Suarez.

I got back three very different responses:

From R:

Please stop bringing up the Pearls everytime someone mentions The
Old Schoolhouse Magazine. Let people do their own research and
figure out what they personally believe. PLEASE!! This is sooooo

From S (the state what-a-ma-call-it):

Hello Meg,

In order to clarify this a bit, I should offer that The Old Schoolhouse
Magazine and the Suarez family will be conducting an encouraging seminar on
homeschooling. This is not a seminar on child training and this seminar is
not related to No Greater Joy of the Pearl family. Also, this seminar is a
free seminar and there is no cost to attend.

Most homeschool families who are familiar with The Old Schoolhouse Magazine
recognize that within the 200 plus pages of each issue, a broad range of
diverse homeschooling authors, companies, and homeschooling styles have been
included ranging from traditional texts, unit studies, classical education,
to eclectic methods of homeschooling.

In the past, No Greater Joy has advertised within the magazine. As with all
homeschool companies that appear in the magazine, The Old Schoolhouse does
not endorse all of the specifics of any homeschooling method, company, or
individual. I cannot speak for what the Pearl family presents in their
publications. Our family has homeschooled for 8+ years and we have never
utilized their publications or methods within our own family.

I can speak positively for The Old Schoolhouse magazine because I have
worked with them for a couple of years on various projects. The Suarez’s are
a delightful homeschooling family who enjoy encouraging others. I think this
seminar is going to be a nice event for homeschool families and will also
provide helpful information for families who are considering homeschooling.

And from P:

Sorry R, I can’t help but disagree with you. This is exactly
the type of information I come to this site for. Whether it is the
mental health screening, the HSLDA methodology, or TOS and the
Pearls, all of which have appeared on this site and which I wouldn’t
have been aware of without someone posting. I don’t have time to do
all the research on everything - no one does- and if someone like Meg
can point out an “under the surface” connection, then I can go and
research it specifically, and decide if the connection is merely
incidental or supportive - and vote with my own spending dollars
accordingly. Knowledge is power, so thanks, Meg, for the power boost.

Now, I usually type up my flag and let it go at that. But this just called out for a response.

R, S, and P - My thoughts

R- I understand that you are sick of hearing about this. So am I.

But there are always new homeschoolers and TOS comes up constantly. We are nearing the 1 year anniversary of a young boy’s death which brought this issue to a head and that makes it more important to keep the issue alive.

I hope if you truly have read my posts, you’ll realize that I try very carefully to not make a flat ‘don’t do this’ I am trying hard to bring the issue to light and allow others to make their own judgements. I do usually conclude with an opinion statement - yes - but it is very toned down from what I might be saying.

S - I appreciate your response and I’m sure that this whole thing has made you do some deep thinking. Here’s my opinion.

First, about this talk. If you look over my post, you will see that I very explicitly state that the Suarez family will probably have some very wonderful advice for homeschoolers. But I am willing to make a wager that there will be subscriptions available for sale. Hence the comment about not putting any money into their hands. And if there is any discussion about subscribing to TOS, there will also be mention of their 19 ‘gifts.’ That’s my current problem with the Suarez family.

And that leads to my second point. The Suarez family by the nature of being the publishers of a successful magazine are not like you or I when it comes to their actions. They have taken on the mantle of ‘expert’ (the reason why they can give a talk like this and people will be interested). When you become an expert, what you say and do has ‘value’ and people will follow it often without thinking and doing their own research.

And that brings me to my third point. Last March when the poor little boy died, fingers pointed to the Pearls and their methods. At that time, TOS gave away one of the Pearl’s books as one of those 19 gifts (point 1) and accepted their advertisements in the magazine. That was an endorsement of the Pearls given by a respected expert in the homeschooling field (point 2). I also have it from a friend, that I respect, that Gena made a public statement supporting the Pearls and their methods (point 2 again). I feely admit that I did not see Gena’s statement as an orginal from her, so this not a strong support for my argument.

That was when a boycott of TOS was called.

And that brings me to my fourth point. It’s now 10 months later, whether the Suarezs have been affected by the boycott or did some thinking on their own - I can’t tell you. But I can tell you that they no longer give a copy of the Pearl’s book as one of those 19 gifts…..well, sort of. You see, they now give you some samples of another homeschooling magazine. That magazine will happily send you a copy of the Pearl’s book when you subscribe to them.

Lastly, a boycott can only be fair if there is a point at which it will end. This boycott has that. The homeschoolers that support the boycott would like two things from the Suarezs and their magazine. 1.- A clear statement that they do not support the Pearls and their methods. 2. - A complete disconnect to anything that connects to the Pearls and their books.

P - Thank you. It’s always nice to not feel like a voice in the wilderness, especially so when the message is heard so clearly. Yes, I really just want people to do their own research and draw their own conclusions. The books are available online, please go read them. If you see them as acceptable methods, hey it’s your family. I can not stop you. But if you feel at all questionable about the methods, at least you’ll realize that you aren’t alone.

9 Comments »

  1. Frankie said,

    December 29, 2006 at 4:53 am

    Thank you…for continuing to put the information out there. Your response was beautifully written.

  2. Steph said,

    December 29, 2006 at 11:22 am

    This is interesting. I knew that TOS had stopped including the Pearls’ book in their “gifts,” but I did not know they were still offering it in an indirect way. Thank you for continuing to make people aware of this issue. I agree with Frankie. Your responses were beautifully written.

  3. Doc said,

    December 29, 2006 at 2:04 pm

    Every single day I get hits on my site from searches for something to do with the Pearls, or TOS, or the Suarez’s. TOS was affected by the boycott, whether they will admit it or not. They publish their subscription data on their business page. They had a dramatic drop off in both subscriptions and in blog uses in the first part of the year. Any gains they’ve made have been countered by lost revenue in increased advertising costs because they’ve had to reach out farther and farther to find unsuspecting homescohoolers who haven’t heard (or don’t care) about their associations. As for the Pearls themselves, they will never recover from the negative publicity the boycott generated. Positive discussions about the Pearls don’t happen on most message boards - unless they’re private Christians ones. While Amazon still carries their materials, the hundreds and hundreds of negative reviews (that are still being posted) probably don’t help them much…

  4. Not June Cleaver said,

    December 30, 2006 at 10:46 am

    Great response. The first thing I thought when I saw “S’s” reply about the magazine and the seminar offering great advice unrelated to the Pearl’s “methods” was that until they clearly state that they do not have connections to the Pearls, it doesn’t matter how helpful it might be. That’s the whole point. If the boycott is hurting them, they could make the necessary changes to fix it. Apparently they choose not to.

  5. Andrea (admin) said,

    December 30, 2006 at 3:48 pm

    Well done. Thank you for continuing to have the energy to actively educate people about these things. I still do so when asked, or when the issue comes up in a conversation I am part of.

    With that in mind, I can tell you that TOS and HSBlogger actively seek out “volunteers” to head up blogs for each state/province. Since they are all published on their system, they do benefit directly by having people work for them. Also, having such a set-up makes everything more “official” from the standpoint of setting themselves up to be experts. This also leads to people who may be searching for information to begin homeschooling, to get the impression that their way is what homeschooling is all about. It’s not.

    I myself may be experienced and well-versed in homeschooling, but I am only an expert on my children. That’s all.

    System-wide here at HSJ, we get a lot of hits for Pearl-related things. It’s no longer in the top ten monthly though. And from an official standpoint, we haven’t provided this site to toot our own horn, to promote anything in particular (method-wise or doctrine-wise), just to provide homeschoolers of any opinion to have a voice - in case any passer-bys need to read that. :)

  6. Audrey said,

    December 30, 2006 at 9:58 pm

    This would probably explain why I’m getting new hits on my blog with the search track “Pearls boycott.” Good job keeping the word out there. :-)

  7. woodstone said,

    December 31, 2006 at 12:49 pm

    Nice job!!!!! Thank you so much for continuing to spread the word about the Pearls and their connection to TOS. I’ve been surprised how many hit my xanga post about the Pearls gets… It’s an issue that needs to be talked about, thank you for doing such a beautiful and eloquent job of sharing your thoughts.

    I hope you get some snow soon… We have more than enough, I’d be happy to share! :)

  8. Ron said,

    January 2, 2007 at 8:08 pm

    Thank you, thank you, thank you. Another child should not have to die to keep the awareness alive.

    As a side note, I’ve seen a couple of TOS issues and I wouldn’t connect the magazine with S’s description except S stated the connection.

  9. IndianaJane said,

    January 6, 2007 at 12:52 am

    You’ll notice that the moderator didn’t mind what you had to say. :)

    I was just glad you said something, or I would have had to. I got offlist pleas to silence you, too. :) Good job.

Leave a Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

  •  

  • Counters